Order by , and we can deliver your NextDay items by.
In your cart, save the other item s for later in order to get NextDay delivery. We moved your item s to Saved for Later.
Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show
There was a problem with saving your item s for later. You can go to cart and save for later there. Average rating: 0 out of 5 stars, based on 0 reviews Write a review. Tell us if something is incorrect. Book Format: Choose an option. This collection contains some of the best of those stories from t. About This Item We aim to show you accurate product information.
Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer. Become a Patron! View All Events. The Show Must Go On? About the Author Latest Posts. About Stuart Conover Stuart Conover is a father, husband, published author, blogger, geek, entrepreneur, horror fanatic, and runs a few websites including Horror Tree! Leave a Reply Cancel reply.
Search for:. Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter! Mormons Score: 4 , Informative.
Previous versions of this entry
The goal of the polity is not to put homosexuals in jail. The goal is to discourage people from engaging in homosexual practices in the first place, and, when they nevertheless proceed in their homosexual behavior, to encourage them to do so discreetly, so as not to shake the confidence of the community in the polity's ability to provide rules for safe, stable, dependable marriage and family relationships.
Subtle, but important difference there. No real difference at all. Ask anyone married to someone of another race if the old laws should have been left in place. Also, it's not even subtle. Mormons Score: 4 , Insightful.
Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show Audiobook Free Download
No, I wouldn't deny him his right to disagree. To quote from Card, "The goal of the polity is not to put homosexuals in jail. The goal is to discourage people from engaging in homosexual practices in the first place, and, when they nevertheless proceed in their homosexual behavior, to encourage them to do so discreetly" IOW, the goal is to make sure that if you're bold enough to come out of the closet, you also must be bold enough to face arrest.
In Card's case it's being applied only to homosexuals. But what if the old laws still applied to another poster's example racially-mixed marriages? And I find deeply disturbing some of the stuff that goes unchallenged around here. What's amazing about your comment -- and the fact that it got modded up -- is that the entire thread above it is full of people saying that Mormons are nice, great people, and that they'll tolerate you and leave you alone if you want, and that their church is doing a great job of guiding people well.
The major exception was an ex-Mormon or two saying that they were treated badly when leaving. Religion is not under attack, not on Slashdot and not in the United States. What HAS happened is that some evangeli. Mormons Score: 2 , Interesting. Yes, because Bush personally could have done a whole lot, such as keeping the water out of the flooded areas by plugging the holes in the levees with his fingers.
If only he had been there! If you're just interested in useless symbols, take a college English class. Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job! Score: 2 , Flamebait.
Yes, because Bush personally could have done a whole lot, such as Such as giving the head of FEMA job to a qualified person instead of treating it as gift to hand over to his incompetant buddy. But no, let's not blame the result of nepotism and incompetance on the guilty So it would have been the same mess no matter who had been in charge? Mormons Score: 2. The best way to show your respect for someone is to ignore them. Omni magazine? Score: 5 , Informative. Ok, so Orson Scott Card is a great author There are numerous webzines that publish quality stories, out there Try Duotrope's digest [duotrope.
Score: 5 , Insightful. Also, in the "Submissions" section.. We also buy nonexclusive print and audio rights throughout the world and in all languages for inclusion in multi-author anthologies based on the magazine, for which you will receive a pro rata share of the authors' share of advances and royalties, to be reported and paid when reports and payments are received by us from the publisher or, if we are the publisher, every six months after one year after publication, if there are any earnings to report.
Though these rights are not outrageous, they are by no means extraordinary. In fact, they are more restrictive than your average magazine rights - usually they don't restrict your right to publish in other media for a year, like this does eg, according to this you are not allowed to sell your story to any anthology for a year from the publication date So essentially, whereas magazines normally only buy first rights the rights to be the first to publish the story , this one wants to be the only one for at least a year.
Respect for the author's rights? I'll second everything you've said, but I can still see this resource as being an excellent place to get a new author's name known before moving on to better houses with better licensing terms. There aren't that many short-fiction magazines on the market today, so each additional one to be brought forth is worth celebrating. Not that OSC would read slashdot that would require an ability to listen to viewpoints other than your own , but as an open comment to him anyway: I, for one, welcome our new You arer kidding, right? Score: 3 , Insightful. Card's site actually looks like a real magazine.
I'm not suggesting Card's magazine doesn't have good content - but so do many free webzines out there, if only because they pay roughly the same rates Daniel. Re:nope Score: 2. I know when I'm browsing the stacks at the local bookstore I'll look past books with crappy covers -if I'm not familiar with the author anyhow.
I doubt I'm unusual in that respect. You aren't, but this is webzines we're talking about Card's Ideals Score: 3 , Informative. Re:Card's Ideals Score: 5 , Insightful. Re:Card's Ideals Score: 2 , Insightful. The Church is against this too. They know how I stand, I know how they stand, and we are okay with that. They do their marches, and I send letters. I don't agree with the idea of same sex "marriages", and calling couples "families", but you know something?
Re:Card's Ideals Score: 3 , Insightful. I will not persecute them. But I disagree with the lifestyle. Yes, you've put your finger nicely on the problem there. Sometime in the last two-three decades the definition of "tolerance" has changed from 'tolerating', as you display here, to the necessity to actively approve the behaviour in question.nsp-business.ru/images
Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show
A rather intriguing proposition when the behaviour in question is multiculturalism, to say the least; note that nobody ever criticizes Muslims for their anti-homosexual stances, for instance. Am I a bigot?
- Current topics in cellular regulation. Vol.15 : 1979?
- Orson Scott Card's Intergalactic Medicine Show on Apple Books?
- Orson Scott Card's InterGalactic medicine show.
My only issue is codifying YOUR religious beliefs in law. I'm in favor of cutting the Gordian knot. I think there should be no not any, zero State sanctioning or involvement with marriage. No tax breaks except for children, whose legal guardianship can be established. No tax hikes.
Want survivor benefits? Sign a contract.